Thus, there must be some reason behind it. Perhaps Charlie simply forgot that he had
left the Peters’ address for Schaeffer.
Perhaps he is initially surprised when they arrive, momentarily
forgetting he left the Peters’ address, but then his protestation that he had
not given them the address was a defensive mechanism in order to ensure he
could get his little girl.
However, even when he runs into Duncan and Lorraine at the
restaurant with Honoria, he hesitates to give out his hotel. Again, this suggests that he does not want
them to know where he is at, which contradicts his leaving the Peters’ address
for Schaeffer in the beginning. Charlie
also appears hesitant throughout to spend time with Duncan and Lorraine, so it
seems odd that he would leave his address, let alone his brother-in-law’s
address, for them. He appears to
understand that his association with them could damage his chances to get back
his daughter, so why would he leave his brother-in-law’s address for Schaeffer? Perhaps, he doesn’t believe he deserves his
daughter back. Or perhaps, he thinks she’ll
be better off without him.
Hi Jessica,
ReplyDeleteI questioned this too. My thought is that in the beginning he did give them the address. He probably did this, because if the two were to go to his relatives, they would be dismissed by his in-laws. I thought that perhaps they did show up at his in-laws and Marion turned this into her advantage. I think that she gave them his hotel address and told them when to show up at the house-how else would they know when he was going to be there? My belief is that she did this so that she could have a reason to discredit Charlie and keep Honoria. ~Amy Nellis
That's a good point about the addresses, Jessica.
ReplyDelete